Origin of life
Std 10 introduced Lamarck and Darwin; here we study the origin of life, evidences, mechanisms of evolution and human evolution in depth.
Ingredients combine into a dish; likewise chemicals are believed to have combined into life.
Chemical evolution = gradual origin of life from non-living chemicals. Protobionts = molecular aggregates with some properties of life.
In the figure : Steps in the origin of life.
Rule 1 : Older theories — Special creation: created by God (a religious belief; no proof). Cosmozoa / panspermia: life came from other planets as spores; does not explain origin on Earth. Spontaneous generation (abiogenesis): life from non-living matter; refuted by Redi (flies and maggots) and Louis Pasteur (swan-neck flask). Biogenesis: life arises only from life; explains continuity but not the first life.
- Easy : Pasteur: swan-neck flask.
- Medium : Biogenesis = life → life.
- Exam-type (CET) : Abiogenesis was refuted.
Rule 2 : Chemical evolution, Miller–Urey, RNA World — Oparin (1924) + Haldane (1929). Big Bang (Lemaitre 1931): universe ~20 billion y ago; Earth ~4.6 billion y ago; primitive atmosphere reducing (no oxygen; CH₄, NH₃, H₂, water). Reactions gave simple organic molecules (sugars, amino acids, purines, pyrimidines) → collected in water = ‘hot dilute soup’; polymerisation → proteins, nucleic acids → protobionts: coacervates (Oparin), microspheres (Fox). Miller and Urey (1953): CH₄:NH₃:H₂ = 1:2:2 + water vapour + electric spark → amino acids, urea, lactic acid. RNA World: first life based on RNA (Woese, Crick, Orgel 1960; ribozymes and RNA catalysis in ribosomes as evidence); DNA and proteins came later. First life ~2000 million y ago.
- Easy : Miller: 1953.
- Medium : Reducing = no O₂.
- Exam-type (CET) : Coacervate = Oparin; microsphere = Fox.
O-H-M: Oparin-Haldane, Miller-Urey, … RNA first.
‘Free O₂ was present’ is wrong. Trap: ‘Miller did Pasteur's experiment’ is wrong.
Memory clue : "Miller–Urey gases 1:2:2 = methane : ammonia : hydrogen".
Spot the difference
| Scientist | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Redi / Pasteur | Refuted abiogenesis |
| Oparin–Haldane | Chemical evolution |
| Miller–Urey | Amino acids formed |
| Woese–Crick–Orgel | RNA World |
Practice questions
- 1Who refuted abiogenesis?
- 2What is biogenesis?
- 3Age of Earth?
- 4Primitive atmosphere?
- 5Haldane's ‘soup’?
- 6Who named coacervates?
- 7Gases in Miller's experiment?
- 8Who proposed RNA World?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1Pasteur.
- 2Life from life.
- 3~4.6 billion years.
- 4Reducing.
- 5Hot dilute soup.
- 6Oparin.
- 7CH₄, NH₃, H₂ (1:2:2).
- 8Woese, Crick, Orgel.
Early theories of evolution
Why is the giraffe's neck long? Different explanations gave rise to several theories.
Organic evolution = slow, gradual, continuous and irreversible change from simple ancestors to present complex forms. Darwin: ‘descent with modification’.
In the figure : Lamarck, Darwin and de Vries.
Rule 1 : Lamarck and Darwin — Lamarck (1809): acquired traits from use/disuse and need are inherited (e.g. giraffe's neck lengthened to reach tall trees). Weismann cut rats' tails for 21 generations — no change; so germplasm continuity (somatic changes are not inherited). Darwin (voyage 1831–36; Galápagos finches and tortoises; Wallace, Malthus, artificial selection): 1 overproduction, 2 struggle for existence, 3 variations, 4 natural selection (Spencer: ‘survival of the fittest’), 5 origin of new species. Limits: cause and inheritance of variations unexplained; intermediate forms not found.
- Easy : Lamarck: use and disuse.
- Medium : Weismann: 21 generations.
- Exam-type (CET) : Darwin: 5 points.
Rule 2 : de Vries' mutation theory — Hugo de Vries (1901): in 7 generations of Oenothera lamarckiana some offspring showed sudden, clear differences. Features: mutations are large, sudden, random, discontinuous; inheritable; raw material of evolution; useful ones are selected, harmful ones eliminated; accumulation gives new species. Objections: de Vries' big changes were really chromosomal aberrations; gene mutations are usually small; rate is low.
- Easy : Mutation = sudden and inherited.
- Medium : 1901: de Vries.
- Exam-type (CET) : Oenothera = experimental plant.
L-D-V: Lamarck-use, Darwin-selection, de Vries-mutation.
‘Darwin accepted acquired traits’ is wrong (Lamarck). Trap: ‘Weismann supported Lamarck’ is wrong (he refuted it).
Memory clue : "Lamarck = long neck by use; Darwin = the fit survive".
Spot the difference
| Theory | Main idea |
|---|---|
| Lamarck | Use–disuse, acquired traits |
| Darwin | Natural selection |
| de Vries | Mutations |
| Weismann | Germplasm continuity |
Practice questions
- 1Year of Lamarck's theory?
- 2Weismann's experiment?
- 3Who coined ‘survival of the fittest’?
- 4Island group visited by Darwin?
- 5First postulate of Darwin?
- 6Plant of de Vries?
- 7Year of mutation theory?
- 8One objection to mutation theory?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 11809.
- 2Cut tails for 21 generations.
- 3Herbert Spencer.
- 4Galápagos.
- 5Overproduction.
- 6Oenothera lamarckiana.
- 71901.
- 8Changes were chromosomal aberrations.
Mechanisms of evolution, isolation and speciation
A river dividing a village slowly makes the two sides speak differently — likewise in animals.
Speciation = formation of new species. A species = organisms that interbreed and produce fertile offspring.
In the figure : Mechanisms of evolution.
Rule 1 : Factors changing the gene pool — A Mendelian population = a small interbreeding group; the sum of its genes = gene pool. Changing factors: mutation, genetic recombination, gene flow (migration) (exchange of alleles), genetic drift (chance change in allele frequency; strong in small groups; founder effect: when a few individuals found a new colony), natural selection, non-random mating. Isolation = splitting a population into sub-units; barriers (river, mountains) stop gene flow.
- Easy : Drift = chance.
- Medium : Gene flow = migration.
- Exam-type (CET) : Founder effect = small colony.
Rule 2 : Types of speciation — Intraspecific: (i) Allopatric — by a geographical barrier (glaciers, mountains, migration); e.g. Galápagos finches (14 species), Australian marsupials; adaptive radiation. (ii) Sympatric — without barrier, through reproductive isolation; e.g. Cichlid fishes of Lake Victoria; mutations help. Interspecific: hybridisation + chromosome doubling gives a new species — e.g. wheat Triticum aestivum (hexaploid). Sterile hybrid: mule (donkey × mare).
- Easy : Allopatric = barrier.
- Medium : Sympatric = no barrier.
- Exam-type (CET) : Mule = sterile.
Allo = away (different place); sym = same place.
‘Sympatric needs a geographical barrier’ is wrong. Trap: ‘genetic drift = natural selection’ is wrong.
Memory clue : "Allopatric = away, sympatric = same place".
Spot the difference
| Type | Barrier | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Allopatric | Geographical | Galápagos finches |
| Sympatric | None | Cichlids |
| Interspecific | Hybridisation | Triticum aestivum |
Practice questions
- 1What is a gene pool?
- 2What is gene flow?
- 3What is genetic drift?
- 4Founder effect?
- 5Allopatric example?
- 6Sympatric example?
- 7Define species.
- 8A sterile hybrid?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1Sum of all genes in the population.
- 2Exchange of alleles by migration.
- 3Chance change in allele frequency.
- 4Drift due to a small founding group.
- 5Galápagos finches.
- 6Lake Victoria cichlids.
- 7Interbreed with fertile offspring.
- 8Mule.
Natural selection, Hardy–Weinberg and adaptive radiation
When soot darkened tree bark, dark moths hid better and became more numerous.
Natural selection = those with favourable variations survive. Hardy–Weinberg = allele frequencies stay constant in a non-evolving population. Adaptive radiation = many forms from one ancestor.
In the figure : Types of selection and Hardy–Weinberg.
Natural selection, Hardy–Weinberg and adaptive radiation
In the app you can move this figure with your finger.
Open in the appRule 1 : Three types of natural selection — Stabilising: intermediate form survives, both extremes lost; variation reduced; stability (e.g. medium-weight babies). Directional: shifts towards one extreme; evolutionary change (e.g. industrial melanism — dark moths; DDT-resistant mosquitoes). Disruptive: both extremes survive, intermediate lost; two peaks; rare (e.g. African seed-cracker finches: large and small beaks).
- Easy : Stabilising = middle.
- Medium : Directional = one extreme.
- Exam-type (CET) : Disruptive = both extremes.
Rule 2 : Hardy–Weinberg and adaptive radiation — Hardy–Weinberg principle: at equilibrium allele and genotype frequencies remain constant across generations. p = dominant allele, q = recessive; p + q = 1; p² + 2pq + q² = 1 (AA : Aa : aa). E.g. if q = 0.3 then p = 0.7; AA = 0.49, Aa = 0.42, aa = 0.09. Factors disturbing it: mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, recombination, natural selection, non-random mating; without them the population does not evolve. Adaptive radiation: one ancestor gives many adapted forms — Darwin's finches (Galápagos; varied beaks), Australian marsupials.
- Easy : p + q = 1.
- Medium : 0.49 + 0.42 + 0.09 = 1.
- Exam-type (CET) : H–W: no evolution.
S-D-D: stabilising = stay, directional = drift to one side, disruptive = divide.
‘Stabilising selection drives evolution’ is wrong. Trap: ‘p² = heterozygotes’ is wrong (2pq).
Memory clue : "2pq = heterozygous".
Spot the difference
| Type | Result |
|---|---|
| Stabilising | Mean kept |
| Directional | Shifts to one end |
| Disruptive | Two peaks |
Practice questions
- 1Hardy–Weinberg equation?
- 2If q = 0.4, p = ?
- 3If q = 0.5, aa = ?
- 4Industrial melanism is which type?
- 5Seed-cracker finches?
- 6Example of adaptive radiation?
- 7With none of the disturbing factors?
- 82pq represents?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1p² + 2pq + q² = 1.
- 20.6.
- 30.25.
- 4Directional.
- 5Disruptive.
- 6Darwin's finches.
- 7Population does not evolve.
- 8Heterozygotes.
Evidences of evolution
A family resemblance reveals kinship; body structure reveals kinship among animals.
Palaeontology = study of fossils. Homologous = similar structure, different function. Analogous = similar function, different structure.
In the figure : Homologous, analogous and vestigial organs.
Rule 1 : Fossils (palaeontology) — Fossils = remains of past organisms; the most direct evidence; older layers hold primitive forms, newer layers advanced ones. Types: moulds (impression in a cavity), casts (minerals filling a mould), compressions (carbon film), ice-preserved (Woolly Mammoth, Siberia), amber (insects in resin). A connecting link shows traits of two groups — Archaeopteryx (reptile ↔ bird; Jurassic, Bavaria 1861): teeth, long tail, claws, scales (reptilian) + feathers, wings, beak (avian); Huxley: ‘glorified reptiles’. Another: Seymouria (amphibian ↔ reptile).
- Easy : Archaeopteryx = reptile + bird.
- Medium : Older layer = primitive.
- Exam-type (CET) : Amber = resin.
Rule 2 : Morphology, embryology, molecular evidences — Homologous (same origin, different function): forelimbs of bat, whale, horse, man, bird; bougainvillea thorn and cucurbita tendril → divergent evolution/adaptive radiation; common ancestry. Analogous (different origin, same function): wings of insects and birds; octopus and mammal eye; penguin and dolphin flippers → convergent evolution; do not show ancestry. Vestigial (rudimentary, non-functional): wisdom teeth, nictitating membrane, coccyx, vermiform appendix. Molecular: cells, DNA/RNA, ATP, the same genetic code; chimp–human DNA difference 2.5%, monkey–human 10%.
- Easy : Homologous = divergent.
- Medium : Analogous = convergent.
- Exam-type (CET) : Vestigial = remnant.
H-D, A-C: homologous-divergent, analogous-convergent.
‘Insect and bird wings are homologous’ is wrong (analogous). Trap: ‘analogous organs show common ancestry’ is wrong.
Memory clue : "Homo = same origin; analo = same job".
Spot the difference
| Point | Homologous | Analogous |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Similar | Different |
| Function | Different | Similar |
| Evolution | Divergent | Convergent |
Practice questions
- 1Study of fossils?
- 2Archaeopteryx links?
- 3Homologous example?
- 4Analogous example?
- 5Vestigial example?
- 6Divergent evolution applies to?
- 7Chimp–human DNA difference?
- 8What is amber?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1Palaeontology.
- 2Reptiles and birds.
- 3Forelimbs of bat and man.
- 4Insect and bird wings.
- 5Wisdom teeth / appendix.
- 6Homologous organs.
- 72.5%.
- 8Hardened resin.
Geological time scale
Earth's history is like a huge book; each era is a chapter.
The geological time scale divides Earth's history into eras → periods → epochs, measured in million years ago (mya).
In the figure : Eras and key events.
Rule 1 : Eras and periods — As per the book (mya): Cenozoic 0–65 (age of mammals; angiosperms; man), Mesozoic 65–225 (age of reptiles; Cretaceous 65–135, Jurassic 135–165, Triassic 165–225), Palaeozoic 225–600 (Permian 225–280, Carboniferous 280–345 age of amphibians, Devonian 345–400 age of fishes, Silurian 400–440, Ordovician 440–500, Cambrian 500–590), Proterozoic 600–1600, Archaeozoic 1600–3800 (origin of life). Eras ended with major environmental changes and extinctions.
- Easy : Cenozoic: mammals; Mesozoic: reptiles.
- Medium : Carboniferous: amphibians.
- Exam-type (CET) : Devonian: fishes.
Rule 2 : Sequence of life — Life began in the sea; Cambrian: trilobites; Ordovician: first jawless fishes; Silurian: first land animals and plants (ferns); Devonian: fishes diversify; amphibians; Carboniferous: amphibians, first reptiles, coal forests; Mesozoic: dinosaurs, first birds, Archaeopteryx, dinosaurs extinct at 65 mya; Cenozoic: mammals, primates, man. The coelacanth (a lobe-fin fish) was caught in South Africa in 1938 = a living fossil.
- Easy : 65 mya = dinosaurs ended.
- Medium : Coelacanth = living fossil.
- Exam-type (CET) : Cambrian: trilobites.
C-M-P-P-A: Cenozoic, Mesozoic, Palaeozoic, Proterozoic, Archaeozoic (new → old).
‘Dinosaurs lived in the Cenozoic’ is wrong (Mesozoic). Trap: fishes diversified in the Devonian.
Memory clue : "C-M-P-P-A = ‘Can My Pet Pig Act?’".
Spot the difference
| Era | Age |
|---|---|
| Cenozoic | Mammals |
| Mesozoic | Reptiles |
| Palaeozoic | Amphibians / fishes |
Practice questions
- 1Order of eras (new to old)?
- 2Age of reptiles?
- 3When did dinosaurs go extinct?
- 4Age of amphibians?
- 5First jawless fishes?
- 6When was coelacanth found?
- 7Archaeopteryx era?
- 8Origin of life era?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1Cenozoic, Mesozoic, Palaeozoic, Proterozoic, Archaeozoic.
- 2Mesozoic.
- 3~65 mya.
- 4Carboniferous.
- 5Ordovician.
- 61938.
- 7Mesozoic (Jurassic).
- 8Archaeozoic.
Human evolution
The human journey began with a tree-dweller learning to stand and walk upright.
Human evolution = journey from ape-like ancestors to modern Homo sapiens; key changes: bipedalism, opposable thumb, larger brain.
In the figure : Human evolution sequence and cranial capacity.
Rule 1 : Ancestors and sequence — The ancestor is thought to be a tree-dwelling shrew-like animal. Sequence: Dryopithecus (chimp-like; Africa) → Ramapithecus (man-like; Shivalik, India) → Australopithecus (‘ape brain’, man-like; Taung, S. Africa; 450–600 cc) → Homo habilis (‘handy man’; Olduvai Gorge; 650–800 cc; tools) → Homo erectus (Java/Peking ‘ape man’; ~900 cc; fire, meat) → Neanderthal (Germany; ~1400 cc; 100,000–40,000 y; buried the dead) → Homo sapiens (modern; ~1450 cc; Africa).
- Easy : Cranial capacity rises: 450 → 1450 cc.
- Medium : Habilis = tools.
- Exam-type (CET) : Neanderthal = burial.
Rule 2 : Major trends — Key changes: larger and more complex brain (cranial capacity), bipedal locomotion and upright posture, opposable thumb (grip), flatter face, large frontal lobe (high forehead), language and culture. Intelligence needed matching bodily development. Chimp–human DNA differs by only 2.5%. Brain complexity (frontal lobe), not size alone, determines intelligence.
- Easy : Bipedal + thumb + brain.
- Medium : 2.5% DNA difference.
- Exam-type (CET) : Frontal lobe = intelligence.
D-R-A-H-E-N-S: Dryo, Rama, Austral, Habilis, Erectus, Neanderthal, Sapiens.
‘Humans descended from chimpanzees’ is wrong (common ancestors). Trap: Neanderthal is a side branch/predecessor.
Memory clue : "Habilis = handy; erectus = fire and meat".
Spot the difference
| Name | Cranial capacity |
|---|---|
| Australopithecus | 450–600 cc |
| H. habilis | 650–800 cc |
| H. erectus | 900 cc |
| Neanderthal | 1400 cc |
| H. sapiens | 1450 cc |
Practice questions
- 1Fossil from Shivalik hills?
- 2‘Handy man’?
- 3Man with ape brain?
- 4Java ape man?
- 5Neanderthal cranial capacity?
- 6Name of modern man?
- 7One trend?
- 8Where is Olduvai Gorge?
Show answers (try them yourself first)
- 1Ramapithecus.
- 2Homo habilis.
- 3Australopithecus.
- 4Homo erectus.
- 5~1400 cc.
- 6Homo sapiens.
- 7Bipedal locomotion.
- 8Tanzania.
Quick revision of the whole lesson
| Concept | Key fact |
|---|---|
| Origin | Oparin–Haldane; Miller 1953; RNA World |
| Theories | Lamarck, Darwin, de Vries |
| Mechanisms | Drift, gene flow, allopatric/sympatric |
| Selection / H–W | p² + 2pq + q² = 1 |
| Evidences | Homologous, analogous, vestigial |
| Time scale | Cenozoic → Archaeozoic |
| Human | Australopithecus → H. sapiens |
🎯 Most important points for the exam
- Miller–Urey, RNA World.
- Lamarck, Darwin, de Vries.
- Allopatric / sympatric speciation.
- Hardy–Weinberg.
- Homologous / analogous.
- Geological eras.
- Order of human evolution.
Understand the concept → draw the figure → memorise the key points → solve questions yourself.